Hoffman argues that these allegations are insufficient to plausibly allege both that he acted purposefully to harm the relationship between Plaintiffs and Encompass, and that he acted in the absence of privilege or justification. In arguing that Plaintiffs have not adequately pled these elements, Hoffman relies on the case of Steven J., Inc. v. Landmark American Insurance Company, Civ. A. No. 14-474, 2014 WL 4672498 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 18. 2014), which concluded that “the simple act of a claims adjuster investigating and opining upon an insurance claim at the request of an insurance company cannot, without further well-pleaded facts . . . rise to the level of tortious interference with a contract.” Id. at *4.