From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sterling v. New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 23, 2020
20-CV-10804 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-10804 (CM)

12-23-2020

BRANDON STERLING, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK; NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION; FISHKILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND PRISONER AUTHORIZATION :

Plaintiff, currently detained in the Sullivan County Jail, brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a prisoner must either pay $402.00 in fees - a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee - or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application and a prisoner authorization. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. If the Court grants a prisoner's IFP application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the Court to collect the $350.00 filing fee in installments deducted from the prisoner's account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). A prisoner seeking to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees must therefore authorize the Court to withdraw these payments from his account by filing a "prisoner authorization," which directs the facility where the prisoner is incarcerated to deduct the $350.00 filing fee from the prisoner's account in installments and to send to the Court certified copies of the prisoner's account statements for the past six months. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), (b).

The $52.00 administrative fee for filing a civil action does not apply to persons granted IFP status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Plaintiff submitted an unsigned IFP application and he did not submit a prisoner authorization. Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that "[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's name - or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented." See also Local Civil Rule 11.1(a). The Supreme Court has interpreted Rule 11(a) to require "as it did in John Hancock's day, a name handwritten (or a mark handplaced)." Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 764 (2001).

Plaintiff is directed to resubmit the signature page of the IFP application with an original signature and a completed and signed prisoner authorization to the Court within thirty days of the date of this order. A copy of the signature page of the IFP application and a prisoner authorization are attached to this order. If Plaintiff submits the signature page of IFP application and prisoner authorization, they should be labeled with docket number 20-CV-10804 (CM).

Plaintiff is cautioned that if a prisoner files a federal civil action that is dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the dismissal is a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A prisoner who receives three "strikes" cannot file actions IFP as a prisoner, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, and he must pay the filing fees at the time of filing any new action.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 23, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sterling v. New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 23, 2020
20-CV-10804 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Sterling v. New York

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON STERLING, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK; NEW YORK STATE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 23, 2020

Citations

20-CV-10804 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2020)