From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. Venetozzi

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 2021
13-cv-5779 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2021)

Opinion

13-cv-5779 (RA)

12-21-2021

BENJAMIN STEPHENS, JR., Plaintiff, v. D. VENETOZZI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

It has been reported to the Court that a settlement in principle has been reached with all parties. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same forty-five-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Stephens v. Venetozzi

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 2021
13-cv-5779 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Stephens v. Venetozzi

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN STEPHENS, JR., Plaintiff, v. D. VENETOZZI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 21, 2021

Citations

13-cv-5779 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2021)