From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. United States Dep't of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Apr 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11CV833-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11CV833-HEH

04-24-2012

LORENZO DESHON STEPHENS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Dismissing Civil Rights Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on January 23, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. The Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with either of the above directives within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff has not complied with the order of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return the consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such actions demonstrate a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall issue. Richmond, Virginia

_______________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stephens v. United States Dep't of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Apr 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11CV833-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Stephens v. United States Dep't of Justice

Case Details

Full title:LORENZO DESHON STEPHENS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11CV833-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2012)