From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 4, 1936
85 F.2d 570 (6th Cir. 1936)

Opinion

No. 7229.

March 4, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Kentucky; H. Church Ford, Judge.

Action by Albert Stephens, administrator of the estate of Thomas E. Stephens, deceased, against the United States. From an adverse judgment, the plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

J.B. Johnson, of Williamsburg, Ky., for appellant.

Mac Swinford, U.S. Atty., of Lexington, Ky.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.


It appearing that this suit was brought by the administrator of the estate of Thomas E. Stephens, who served in the United States Army from December 18, 1914, to July 25, 1917, to recover automatic insurance for the benefit of his brothers and sisters under section 401 of the amended War Risk Insurance Act passed October 6, 1917 ( 40 Stat. 409), as again amended by section 19 of the Act of June 25, 1918 ( 40 Stat. 609, 614, 615), but that the statute does not provide for the payment of such automatic insurance benefits to brothers and sisters of a deceased soldier, and it further appearing that such benefits were in the nature of gratuities and that the statute allowing them was repealed by section 17 of title 1 of the Act of March 20, 1933, commonly called the Economy Act, ch. 3, 48 Stat. 11 (U.S.C. tit. 38, § 717 [38 U.S.C.A. § 717]),

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order of the District Court sustaining the demurrer to appellant's petition be, and the same is, affirmed.


Summaries of

Stephens v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 4, 1936
85 F.2d 570 (6th Cir. 1936)
Case details for

Stephens v. United States

Case Details

Full title:STEPHENS v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Mar 4, 1936

Citations

85 F.2d 570 (6th Cir. 1936)

Citing Cases

United States v. Oliver

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the District Court in this case is reversed upon the authority of Stephens v.…

United States v. Jackson

Thus the case is distinguished from the decision in the case of Lynch v. U.S., 292 U.S. 571, 54 S.Ct. 840, 78…