From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephens v. Stephens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 17, 1989
146 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

January 17, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; the defendant's time within which to comply with the plaintiff's discovery demands or to supply his affidavit is extended until 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order with notice of entry.

The record supports the determination of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, that the defendant did not willfully and contumaciously resist disclosure (see generally, Sawh v Bridges, 120 A.D.2d 74). Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not err in only conditionally granting the plaintiff's motion to strike the defendant's answer. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stephens v. Stephens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 17, 1989
146 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Stephens v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM W. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. WOODFORD C. STEPHENS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1989

Citations

146 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Walk & Smile, Inc. v. 2491 Atlantic Avenue Corp.

Applying these principles of law to the facts in this case, I find that it fits within the narrow confines of…

Rector v. Goodloe

(b) An express trust as to real estate cannot be created, manifested or proved except by writing signed by…