From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephen v. Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-1678 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1678 KJM KJN P

01-22-2013

JIMMIE STEPHEN, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL RECEIVER J.C. KELSO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has filed with this court a letter addressed to District Judge Henderson. (Dkt. No. 87.) Judge Henderson does not sit in this court, but in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Moreover, this court appointed counsel for plaintiff on August 10, 2012, and plaintiff is now represented by attorney Tanya E. Moore. (Dkt. No. 72.) By order filed September 6, 2012, the court informed plaintiff that he may no longer file matters in this action in pro se, but must appear through his appointed counsel. (Dkt. No. 81.) Plaintiff is again reminded of this requirement, and informed that failure to abide by this admonishment may result in the imposition of sanctions.

______________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Stephen v. Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-1678 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Stephen v. Kelso

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE STEPHEN, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL RECEIVER J.C. KELSO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1678 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2013)