From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stephansen v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1939
257 App. Div. 1050 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Summary

In Stephansen v. County of Westchester (257 App. Div. 1050) during the trial a motion was made to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Summary of this case from Fine v. Cummins

Opinion

July 7, 1939.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for loss of services, defendants appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Appeal dismissed, without costs, and without prejudice to a review of the order in question on an appeal from whatever judgment may be entered on the termination of the trial. The order appealed from was made upon a ruling on the trial and, therefore, is not appealable. ( Brauer v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co., 77 App. Div. 407; Stevens v. Naumburg, 214 id. 94; Jackman v. Hasbrouck, 168 id. 256; Water Right Electrical Co. Inc., v. Rockland Light Power Co., 245 id. 739.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stephansen v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1939
257 App. Div. 1050 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

In Stephansen v. County of Westchester (257 App. Div. 1050) during the trial a motion was made to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Summary of this case from Fine v. Cummins
Case details for

Stephansen v. County of Westchester

Case Details

Full title:MARGUERITE L. STEPHANSEN and STEPHAN STEPHANSEN, JR., Respondents, v. THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 1050 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Lavin v. Lavin

Present — Close, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ. Motion to dismiss appeal on the ground that…

Kandell v. American Beverage Corporation

The motion to dismiss the complaint should have been granted. On this record, however, we can do nothing but…