From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sten v. Desrocher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 24, 2004
8 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

93987.

Decided and Entered June 24, 2004.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Clinton County (McGill, J.), entered February 20, 2003, which affirmed a judgment of the City Court of the City of Plattsburgh in favor of defendants.

Nicholas J. Sten, Monsey, appellant pro se.

Law Office of Lori A. Cantwell, Plattsburgh (Kathleen R. Insley of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Spain, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Plaintiff appeals to this Court (see CPLR 5703 [b]) from County Court's affirmance (see UJCA 1701, 1807) of a City Court judgment dismissing his small claims action in which he sought compensation for damage to his car sustained in a motor vehicle accident. "The standard of review in small claims cases is limited to whether 'substantial justice has not been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law'" (Moses v. Randolph, 236 A.D.2d 706, 707, quoting UJCA 1807;see Jacobson v. Sassower, 66 N.Y.2d 991, 993; Borman v. Purvis, 299 A.D.2d 615, 616). Here, City Court heard testimony from plaintiff, defendant Todd Desrocher (hereinafter defendant) and a State Trooper who investigated the accident. There was evidence indicating that defendant was operating his vehicle in a reasonably prudent fashion and City Court credited that proof. City Court's determination that plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proving any negligence by defendant was not clearly erroneous or "so shocking as to not be substantial justice" ( Blair v. Five Points Shopping Plaza, 51 A.D.2d 167, 169). The remaining arguments have been considered and found meritless.

Spain, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Sten v. Desrocher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 24, 2004
8 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Sten v. Desrocher

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS J. STEN, Appellant, v. TODD DESROCHER ET AL., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 24, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 727

Citing Cases

Deleon v. Kalil

Initially, we note that City Court properly dismissed the action as against all defendants other than Kalil,…

Deleon v. Kalil

Initially, we note that City Court properly dismissed the action as against all defendants other than Kalil,…