From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steltz v. Meyers

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Mar 2, 2021
249 A.3d 887 (Pa. 2021)

Opinion

No. 225 EAL 2020

03-02-2021

Craig STELTZ, Respondent v. William C. MEYERS, M.D.; Vincera Core Institute and Vincera Institute, Petitioners


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioners, is:

Whether the Superior Court misapplied and fundamentally altered Pennsylvania's settled standard for prejudice caused by statements or questions of trial counsel, which forbids a new trial on a record like this, where defense counsel's question was based on the record, the trial court issued a curative instruction, the jury was repeatedly instructed that statements and questions of counsel are not evidence, and the closing arguments of both counsel fully addressed the subject matter of defense counsel's question?


Summaries of

Steltz v. Meyers

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Mar 2, 2021
249 A.3d 887 (Pa. 2021)
Case details for

Steltz v. Meyers

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG STELTZ, Respondent v. WILLIAM C. MEYERS, M.D.; VINCERA CORE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 2, 2021

Citations

249 A.3d 887 (Pa. 2021)

Citing Cases

Steltz v. Meyers

Whether the Superior Court misapplied and fundamentally altered Pennsylvania's settled standard for prejudice…