From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinmetz v. Harrison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 5, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-829 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-829

12-05-2014

MATTHEW FRANKLIN STEINMETZ, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER HARRISON, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(Doc. 10)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on November 13, 2014, submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 10). No objections were filed.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Crutchfield, Mohr, Frye, and John Doe are DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 12/5/14

/s/ Timothy S. Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Steinmetz v. Harrison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 5, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-829 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Steinmetz v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW FRANKLIN STEINMETZ, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER HARRISON, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 5, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-829 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 5, 2014)