From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinman v. Russell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 1964
20 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

January 30, 1964


Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, without costs. In view of the improper remarks made by counsel during summation, although not sufficient to warrant a reversal of the judgment, costs are not awarded to the prevailing party.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Steinman v. Russell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 1964
20 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Steinman v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:FANNIE STEINMAN, Appellant, v. DONALD A. RUSSELL, an Infant, by His…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1964

Citations

20 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)