From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinkirchner v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 13, 1957
247 F.2d 83 (D.C. Cir. 1957)

Opinion

No. 13580.

Argued May 10, 1957.

Decided June 13, 1957.

Mr. Claude L. Dawson, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Melvin Richter, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub and Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Robert Pitofsky, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit Judges.


Certain positions in the Navy Department, including appellant's, were surveyed and downgraded under the Classification Act of 1949, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1071. Some employees who were not veterans got new positions at the old level. Appellant, who was a veteran, did not. He appeals, relying on Section 12 of the Veterans Preference Act as amended, 5 U.S.C.A. § 861. This section provides for military preference in any "reduction in personnel". Since no such reduction occurred, this section does not apply. Cf. Cutting v. Higley, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 235 F.2d 515, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 883, 77 S.Ct. 99, 1 L.Ed.2d 81; Wagner v. Higley, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 291, 235 F.2d 518, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 936, 77 S. Ct. 230, 1 L.Ed.2d 165. Cf. Parks v. United States, Ct.Cl., 147 F. Supp. 261.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Steinkirchner v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 13, 1957
247 F.2d 83 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
Case details for

Steinkirchner v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:Anthony J. STEINKIRCHNER, Appellant, v. Charles E. WILSON, Secretary of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jun 13, 1957

Citations

247 F.2d 83 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
101 U.S. App. D.C. 92

Citing Cases

Hofflund v. Seaton

Whether or not the District Court was correct in so deciding is not at issue hear, as the Government did not…

Bright v. Macy

In the examples supplied in the circular the Department states that error in initial allocation must be…