From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steininger v. Tribune Broad. Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 14, 2021
19 Civ. 3644 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

19 Civ. 3644 (PAE)

09-14-2021

BRETT STEININGER, Plaintiffs, v. TRIBUNE BROADCASTING COMPANY, LLC ET AL Defendants.


ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, DISTRICT JUDGE:

The Court has received a letter from plaintiff requesting reconsideration of its bench ruling barring examination at trial eliciting (1) a prior claim of an unspecified type of harassment made informally against defendant Tzianabos; and (2) an age discrimination claim brought against defendant Tzianabos by another WPIX-Tribune employee. Dkt. 78. In the interest of obtaining a complete record on this point, the Court directs defendants to respond to plaintiffs letter by the close of business on September 15, 2021. The Court does not invite reply.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Court does not presently anticipate changing its ruling, which stands unless and until an order stating otherwise issues.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Steininger v. Tribune Broad. Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 14, 2021
19 Civ. 3644 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Steininger v. Tribune Broad. Co.

Case Details

Full title:BRETT STEININGER, Plaintiffs, v. TRIBUNE BROADCASTING COMPANY, LLC ET AL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

19 Civ. 3644 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)