From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steinfeld v. Ulick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 1956
1 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

April 24, 1956


Orders unanimously modified so as to reserve to defendant the right to bring an independent action which may include all of the matters asserted by way of counterclaim if he be so advised. Otherwise the orders and judgment are affirmed. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Peck, P.J., Breitel, Botein, Frank and Bergan, JJ. [See post, p. 1008.]


Summaries of

Steinfeld v. Ulick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 1956
1 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Steinfeld v. Ulick

Case Details

Full title:HARRY STEINFELD, Respondent, v. SIDNEY ULICK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1956

Citations

1 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)