From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stein v. Valentine & Kebartas, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 24, 2012
10 CV 2465 (RJD) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2012)

Summary

noting that, in determining whether a default judgment is appropriate, a court may consider whether the facts alleged in the complaint state a valid claim

Summary of this case from Pac. M. Int'l Corp. v. Raman Int'l Gems, Ltd.

Opinion

10 CV 2465 (RJD) (CLP)

04-24-2012

MOSHE STEIN, Plaintiff, v. VALENTINE & KEBARTAS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

DEARIE, Judge.

In her Report and Recommendation issued March 15, 2012, Magistrate Judge Cheryl Pollak finds that plaintiffs barebones allegations are not sufficient, under the standards set forth in Ashcroft v. Iqbal. 129 S. Ct. 1938, 1949 (2009), to state a claim against defendant under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S. C. § 1692e(5) and (10). Magistrate Pollak therefore recommends that the Clerk's default entered against the defendant be vacated and that plaintiffs motion for a judgment of default be denied without prejudice to the filing of a more detailed amended complaint.

Neither the plaintiff (who is represented in this action) nor the defendant has filed an objection. Accordingly, having considered the pleading, motion papers and Magistrate Pollak's thorough analysis, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York

April 24, 2012

___________

RAYMOND J. DEARIE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stein v. Valentine & Kebartas, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 24, 2012
10 CV 2465 (RJD) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2012)

noting that, in determining whether a default judgment is appropriate, a court may consider whether the facts alleged in the complaint state a valid claim

Summary of this case from Pac. M. Int'l Corp. v. Raman Int'l Gems, Ltd.
Case details for

Stein v. Valentine & Kebartas, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MOSHE STEIN, Plaintiff, v. VALENTINE & KEBARTAS, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

10 CV 2465 (RJD) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2012)

Citing Cases

Pac. M. Int'l Corp. v. Raman Int'l Gems, Ltd.

Moreover, “ ‘[b]ecause defaults are generally disfavored and are reserved for rare occasions, when doubt…

Moukengeschaie v. Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C.

Where a threat of legal action has been made, in order to state a claim the consumer must also allege that…