From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steeves, Smith Assocs. v. Rubinstein

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport
Jan 21, 2000
2000 Ct. Sup. 945 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2000)

Opinion

No. CV 95 032 70 46

January 21, 2000 CT Page 946


ORDER


When the court revoked the reference on July 28, 1999 it was unaware that an Amended Memorandum of Decision had been filed on July 9, 1999. Indeed, the Memorandum was not on file. The court notes that the deadline for such revision was May 15, 1999 but that date could not be met because the ATR requested additional proposed findings. The court further notes that no pleading has been filed under P. B. § 19-12, § 19-13 or § 19-14. Thus, the Amended Report is ripe for review. The court believes that the ATR has now complied with the order of this court. The amended report is therefore accepted and judgment may enter thereon.

BY THE COURT,

Mottolese, Judge


Summaries of

Steeves, Smith Assocs. v. Rubinstein

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport
Jan 21, 2000
2000 Ct. Sup. 945 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2000)
Case details for

Steeves, Smith Assocs. v. Rubinstein

Case Details

Full title:STEEVES, SMITH ASSOCIATES, INC. VS. ROBERT RUBINSTEIN, IRA J. KAPLAN…

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport

Date published: Jan 21, 2000

Citations

2000 Ct. Sup. 945 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2000)

Citing Cases

Jeffrey v. Allstate Ins. Co.

In Bourgeois v. Tzrop, 9 D.L.R. 2d 214 (1957) the New Brunswick Supreme Court held, without discussion, where…