From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steeple Oil Gas Corp. v. Amend

Supreme Court of Texas
Oct 6, 1965
394 S.W.2d 789 (Tex. 1965)

Summary

reversing and dismissing appeal as underlying summary judgment was interlocutory

Summary of this case from Wagner Brown v. Sheppard

Opinion

No. A-10973.

October 6, 1965.

Appeal from the District Court, Potter County, Mary Lou Robinson, J.

Henry Klepak and Roy J. True, Dallas, for petitioners.

Simpson, Adkins, Fullingim Hankins, Amarillo, for respondent.


Petitioners have attempted to appeal from a partial summary judgment without a severance of the other issues between the parties. Since the judgment is interlocutory and not appealable, under our holding in Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal Oil Company, 159 Tex. 550, 324 S.W.2d 200 (1959), neither this Court nor the Court of Civil Appeals has power to review it. We accordingly reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and dismiss the appeal. McCauley v. Consolidated Underwriters, 157 Tex. 475, 304 S.W.2d 265 (1957).


Summaries of

Steeple Oil Gas Corp. v. Amend

Supreme Court of Texas
Oct 6, 1965
394 S.W.2d 789 (Tex. 1965)

reversing and dismissing appeal as underlying summary judgment was interlocutory

Summary of this case from Wagner Brown v. Sheppard

dismissing an appeal from an interlocutory judgment for lack of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Devon Energy Prod. Co. v. Sheppard
Case details for

Steeple Oil Gas Corp. v. Amend

Case Details

Full title:STEEPLE OIL AND GAS CORPORATION and Raymond A. Baur, Petitioners, v. J. D…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Oct 6, 1965

Citations

394 S.W.2d 789 (Tex. 1965)

Citing Cases

Springer v. First National Bank of Plainview, Texas

Consequently, if the summary judgments are interlocutory, they are not appealable, and our jurisdiction is…

Wagner Brown v. Sheppard

In any event, both opinions were promptly reversed by this Court on other grounds. 392 S.W.2d 744, 746…