From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. Unicon Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 4, 2019
No. 3:19-CV-1679-N-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 4, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:19-CV-1679-N-BH

10-04-2019

COREY STEELE, Plaintiff, v. UNICON GROUP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. The plaintiff's Motion for: Default Judgement Kelly Davis & Assoc., filed August 22, 2019 (doc. 19), and Motion for: Default Judgement Judge Monica Purdy, filed September 3, 2019 (doc. 25), are DENIED.

SIGNED this 4th day of October, 2019.

/s/ _________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Steele v. Unicon Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 4, 2019
No. 3:19-CV-1679-N-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Steele v. Unicon Grp.

Case Details

Full title:COREY STEELE, Plaintiff, v. UNICON GROUP, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2019

Citations

No. 3:19-CV-1679-N-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 4, 2019)