Steele v. TDS Telecomms. Corp.

Full title: ERIC STEELE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: May 10, 2013

Case No. 13-CV-00569 MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 13-CV-00569 MCE-CMK

05-10-2013

ERIC STEELE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. TDS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., Defendant

Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Eric S. Mattson (pro hac vice) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Attorneys for Defendant

MORRISON C. ENGLAND

Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Eric S. Mattson (pro hac vice)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
TDS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Having reviewed Defendant's unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby extends the time for Defendant TDS Telecommunications Corporation to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by 16 days, until May 24, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT