From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. TDS Telecomms. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Apr 19, 2013
Case No. 13-CV-00569 MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 13-CV-00569 MCE-CMK

04-19-2013

ERIC STEELE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. TDS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., Defendant.

Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Eric S. Mattson ( pro hac vice forthcoming ) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Attorneys for Defendant TDS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION


Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Eric S. Mattson (pro hac vice forthcoming)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
TDS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO

RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation Regarding Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint filed on April 15, 2013, the Court hereby orders that Defendant's time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended by 21 days, until May 8, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Steele v. TDS Telecomms. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Apr 19, 2013
Case No. 13-CV-00569 MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Steele v. TDS Telecomms. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC STEELE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Apr 19, 2013

Citations

Case No. 13-CV-00569 MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2013)