Steele v. County of San Bernardino

Full title: TEJAY STEELE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Feb 12, 2010

CV 03-05774-PA (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2010)

Opinion

TEJAY STEELE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, Defendants. No. CV 03-05774-PA (VBK). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. February 12, 2010.

          ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2) DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

          PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Amended Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving and adopting the Amended Report and Recommendation, (2) granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; (3) denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (4) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing the Complaint, and the action, with prejudice.