From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staten v. Wang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
1:09cv00801 DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

1:09cv00801 DLB PC

03-08-2013

DWIGHT A. STATEN, Plaintiff, v. J. WANG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS

Plaintiff Dwight A. Staten ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on May 5, 2009. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on October 23, 2012.

On March 6, 2013, Defendants filed a motion for sanctions, including terminating sanctions, based on Plaintiff's alleged submission of forged documents in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was served with the motion on March 6, 2013.

On March 8, 2013, the Court granted Defendants' ex parte request to stay the summary judgment briefing schedule pending the outcome of the motion for sanctions.

Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order, to respond to Defendants' motion and allegations of forgery. Plaintiff should submit documentation to support his arguments, if any. If necessary, the Court will schedule a hearing to further evaluate Defendants' allegations.

Defendants may file a reply within seven (7) days of receiving CM/ECF notification of Plaintiff's response.

If Plaintiff fails to file a response to the motion, the Court will deem the motion submitted pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Staten v. Wang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
1:09cv00801 DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Staten v. Wang

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT A. STATEN, Plaintiff, v. J. WANG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

1:09cv00801 DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)