From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 20, 1994
69 Ohio St. 3d 70 (Ohio 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2552

Submitted March 1, 1994 —

Decided April 20, 1994.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93AP-655.

Charles B. Yonkings, pro se. Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Joshua T. Cox, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.


The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court's opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 20, 1994
69 Ohio St. 3d 70 (Ohio 1994)
Case details for

State Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE EX REL. YONKINGS, APPELLANT, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 20, 1994

Citations

69 Ohio St. 3d 70 (Ohio 1994)
630 N.E.2d 365

Citing Cases

Yonkings v. Wilkinson

Appellant originally filed a mandamus action against appellees, the Director of the Ohio Department of…

Yonkings v. Wilkinson

This court denied the writ, finding that appellee had an adequate remedy by way of declaratory judgment.…