From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. ZURZ

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 25, 2009
2009 Ohio 1296 (Ohio 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-2149.

March 25, 2009.

In Mandamus.


MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS.

On respondents' motion to dismiss and relators' motion for judgment on the pleadings. On S.Ct.Prac. R. X(5) determination, the motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied, the motion to dismiss is granted, and the cause is dismissed. Relators have an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by filing a complaint in the common pleas court pursuant to R.C. 4115.16(B). See State ex rel. Vaughn Industries, L.L.C. v. Ohio Dept of Commerce, 109 Ohio St.3d 482, 2006-Ohio-2994, 849 N.E.2d 31, ¶ 18; State ex rel. Natl. Elec. Contrs. Assn., Ohio Conference v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Servs. (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 179, 183, 699 N.E.2d 64.

MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.


Summaries of

STATE v. ZURZ

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 25, 2009
2009 Ohio 1296 (Ohio 2009)
Case details for

STATE v. ZURZ

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Northwestern Ohio Bldg. Constr. Trades Council v. Zurz

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

Citations

2009 Ohio 1296 (Ohio 2009)
2009 Ohio 1296