From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Zarate

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jun 15, 2016
885 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

concluding that the sentencing court abused its discretion by not adequately considering the Miller factors, vacating the sentence, and remanding for further proceedings.

Summary of this case from Davis v. State

Opinion

No. 15–0451.

06-15-2016

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Anthony Angel ZARATE, Defendant–Appellant.

Michael B. Oliver of Oliver Gravett Law Firm, P.C., Windsor Heights, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Linda J. Hines, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Sentence Vacated and Case Remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Zarate

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jun 15, 2016
885 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

concluding that the sentencing court abused its discretion by not adequately considering the Miller factors, vacating the sentence, and remanding for further proceedings.

Summary of this case from Davis v. State
Case details for

State v. Zarate

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Anthony Angel ZARATE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Jun 15, 2016

Citations

885 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Roby

Furthermore, the court of appeals has undertaken appellate review of numerous Lyle sentencings and…

Davis v. State

Id . at 147-48. See also State v. Zarate , 885 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016) (concluding that the…