State v. Young

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Young, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 5, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2011-194348 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-194348 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-236

06-05-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Young, Appellant.

Laura L. Hiller, of Hiller & Hiller, PA, and Jonathan Micah Hiller, of Hiller & Hiller, PA, both of Myrtle Beach, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Horry County

Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Laura L. Hiller, of Hiller & Hiller, PA, and Jonathan Micah Hiller, of Hiller & Hiller, PA, both of Myrtle Beach, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]." (emphasis added)); In re Care & Treatment of Corley, 365 S.C. 252, 258, 616 S.E.2d 441, 444 (Ct. App. 2005) ("Constitutional issues, like most others, must be raised to and ruled on by the trial court to be preserved for appeal."). AFFIRMED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.