From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Young

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 31, 2006
136 P.3d 76 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

0506-66659; A129328.

Submitted on record and briefs April 7 2006.

May 31, 2006.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. Lewis B. Lawrence, Judge.

Lance D. Perdue filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Stacey RJ Guise, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman and Ortega, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that she is presently unable to provide for her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. Young

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 31, 2006
136 P.3d 76 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

State v. Young

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Naomi Roxann Young, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 31, 2006

Citations

136 P.3d 76 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)
136 P.3d 76