From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 9, 2022
No. 2022-UP-041 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-041 Appellate Case 2019-002034

02-09-2022

The State, Respondent, v. Douglas Lavance Young, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Douglas L. Young, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2022

Appeal From Charleston County Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, and Douglas L. Young, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 9, 2022
No. 2022-UP-041 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Young

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Douglas Lavance Young, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 9, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-041 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2022)