From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 5, 2013
2013-UP-236 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-236

06-05-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Young, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2011-194348

Laura L. Hiller, of Hiller & Hiller, PA, and Jonathan Micah Hiller, of Hiller & Hiller, PA, both of Myrtle Beach, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted April 1, 2013

Appeal From Horry County Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge

Laura L. Hiller, of Hiller & Hiller, PA, and Jonathan Micah Hiller, of Hiller & Hiller, PA, both of Myrtle Beach, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]." (emphasis added)); In re Care & Treatment of Corley, 365 S.C. 252, 258, 616 S.E.2d 441, 444 (Ct. App. 2005) ("Constitutional issues, like most others, must be raised to and ruled on by the trial court to be preserved for appeal.").

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 5, 2013
2013-UP-236 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Young

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Young, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 5, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-236 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2013)