From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Young

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
May 20, 2019
No. 19-KP-0221 (La. May. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-KP-0221

05-20-2019

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JORELL MURPHY YOUNG


ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TERREBONNE :

Denied. Applicant shows no lower court error.

Applicant has now fully litigated an application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State v. Young

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
May 20, 2019
No. 19-KP-0221 (La. May. 20, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Young

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JORELL MURPHY YOUNG

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: May 20, 2019

Citations

No. 19-KP-0221 (La. May. 20, 2019)