From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Yarbrough

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Nov 26, 1996
934 S.W.2d 638 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Nos. 66973, 70076.

November 26, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; HARRY J. STUSSIE, JUDGE.

A. Renae Adamson and Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Columbia, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before AHRENS, C.J., and CRANDALL, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.


ORDER


Defendant, Charles Yarbrough, appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of first degree tampering, for which he was sentenced to eight years' imprisonment. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

As to defendant's direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant's Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Yarbrough

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Nov 26, 1996
934 S.W.2d 638 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Yarbrough

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES YARBROUGH, APPELLANT. CHARLES…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Nov 26, 1996

Citations

934 S.W.2d 638 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)