From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wright

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 5, 2006
138 P.3d 899 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

0506-66075; A128910.

Submitted on record June 2, 2006.

July 5, 2006.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. Lewis B. Lawrence, Judge.

Daniel J. Casey filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder, is unable to provide for her basic personal needs, and is a danger to herself. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench and bar. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to provide for her basic personal needs or is a danger to herself. We find the state's concession to be well founded and therefore accept it.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. Wright

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 5, 2006
138 P.3d 899 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

State v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Susan Wright, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 5, 2006

Citations

138 P.3d 899 (Or. Ct. App. 2006)
138 P.3d 899