From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wright

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 9, 2003
785 N.E.2d 755 (Ohio 2003)

Opinion

No. 2002-0234.

Submitted February 25, 2003.

Decided April 9, 2003.

Certified by the Court of Appeals for Washington County, No. 00CA39, 2001-Ohio-2473.

Michael G. Spahr, Washington County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Carol A. Wright, for appellant.

Jim Petro, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Kirk A. Lindsey, Associate Solicitor, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Attorney General of Ohio.

David L. Doughten and Paul Skendelas, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.


{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified; there is want of a conflict.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cooney, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.

Colleen Conway Cooney, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.


Summaries of

State v. Wright

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 9, 2003
785 N.E.2d 755 (Ohio 2003)
Case details for

State v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Wright, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 9, 2003

Citations

785 N.E.2d 755 (Ohio 2003)
785 N.E.2d 755

Citing Cases

State v. Ward

The Fourth District even certified a conflict between Wright and Henderson. The Ohio Supreme Court, however,…

State v. Burden

State v. Wright, 94 Ohio St.3d 1504, 764 N.E.2d 1035(2002); however the Court later dismissed the conflict…