Opinion
No. 36107
Decided October 7, 1959.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Possession of burglary tools — Section 2907.11, Revised Code — Intent — Evidence.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.
Mr. C. Watson Hover, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Harry C. Schoettmer, for appellee.
Mr. William F. Hopkins and Mr. Harvey B. Woods, for appellant.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.