Opinion
Docket No. 42194 Docket No. 42195 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 513
06-08-2015
STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER ROBERT WOODS, Defendant-Appellant.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bonneville County. Hon. Jon J. Shindurling, District Judge. Orders relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge and GRATTON, Judge
____________________
PER CURIAM
In Docket No. 42194, Christopher Robert Woods pled guilty to possession of a financial transaction card. I.C. §§ 18-3125(4) and 18-3128(3). The district court sentenced Woods to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, to run concurrent with an unrelated sentence. The district court suspended the sentence and placed Woods on probation.
In Docket No. 42195, Woods pled guilty to attempted burglary. I.C. §§ 18-1401 and 18-306. The district court sentenced Woods to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year, to run consecutive to his sentence in Docket No. 42194. Based upon this guilty plea, the district court revoked Woods's probation in Docket No. 42194 and ordered execution of his original sentence. The district court retained jurisdiction in both cases and sent Woods to participate in the rider program. Thereafter the district court relinquished jurisdiction in both cases. Woods appeals, however, challenging only his consecutive sentence in Docket No. 42195.
Regarding Docket No. 42195, Woods argues that his consecutive sentence is excessive and constitutes an abuse of discretion. Sentences are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Our appellate standard of review and the factors to be considered when evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well-established. State v. Burdett, 134 Idaho 271, 1 P.3d 299 (Ct. App. 2000); State v. Sanchez, 115 Idaho 776, 769 P.2d 1148 (Ct. App. 1989); State v. Reinke, 103 Idaho 771, 653 P.2d 1183 (Ct. App. 1982); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 650 P.2d 707 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). The record does not indicate that the district court abused its discretion in imposing a consecutive sentence.
The orders of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction and Woods's sentence in Docket No. 42195 are affirmed.