From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wimbush

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jul 11, 2016
63 N.E.3d 1181 (Ohio 2016)

Opinion

No. 2014–1717.

07-11-2016

The STATE of Ohio, Appellant, v. WIMBUSH, Appellee.

Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas and Frank Romeo Zeleznikar, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.


Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas and Frank Romeo Zeleznikar, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our decision in State v. Heinz, 146 Ohio St.3d 374, 2016-Ohio-2814, 56 N.E.3d 965.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Wimbush

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jul 11, 2016
63 N.E.3d 1181 (Ohio 2016)
Case details for

State v. Wimbush

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Ohio, Appellant, v. WIMBUSH, Appellee.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Jul 11, 2016

Citations

63 N.E.3d 1181 (Ohio 2016)
63 N.E.3d 1180
147 Ohio St. 3d 252
147 Ohio St. 3d 250