From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 10, 1977
342 So. 2d 670 (La. 1977)

Opinion

No. 57303.

February 10, 1977.

APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, SECTION "C", PARISH OF ORLEANS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE JEROME M. WINSBERG, J.

George M. Leppert, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Attys., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.


On September 27, 1973, the Orleans Parish Grand Jury indicated defendant, Junius Wilson, for the crime of aggravated rape. La.R.S. 14:42. Defendant was tried, convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirm.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 1

Defendant's failure to object to the alleged error complained of constituted a waiver of his objection. La.C.Cr.P. art. 841; State v. Brown, 329 So.2d 701 (La. 1976). This assignment lacks merit.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 2

Defendant could properly be questioned as to a court martial conviction. We have previously held that La.R.S. 15:495 contemplates "the use of evidence of a conviction for the violation of a penal provision for which imprisonment can be imposed." State v. Bradford, 298 So.2d 781, 792 (La. 1974). The conviction in question fulfills that requirement. See 10 U.S.C.A. § 856. This assignment lacks merit.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 3

This assignment was expressly abandoned.

Accordingly, defendant's conviction and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 10, 1977
342 So. 2d 670 (La. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JUNIUS WILSON

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 10, 1977

Citations

342 So. 2d 670 (La. 1977)

Citing Cases

State v. Tolbert

Id. The court reached the same result again in State v. Wilson, 342 So.2d 670 (La. 1977). Without mentioning…

State v. Harrison

Initially, we note that because Harrison failed to object when informed of the trial judge's response, he in…