From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 9, 2022
No. 2022-UP-042 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-042 Appellate Case 2019-002105

02-09-2022

The State, Respondent, v. John Ryan Tate Wilson, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2022

Appeal From Spartanburg County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, GEATHERS, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 9, 2022
No. 2022-UP-042 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. John Ryan Tate Wilson, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 9, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-042 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2022)