From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wilson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 18, 2021
626 S.W.3d 882 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

WD 83611

05-18-2021

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel L. WILSON, Appellant.

Kathryn M. Merwald, Kansas City, for appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, for respondent.


Kathryn M. Merwald, Kansas City, for appellant.

Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Division Four: Cynthia L. Martin, Chief Judge, Presiding, Lisa White Hardwick and W. Douglas Thomson, Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam Daniel Wilson appeals from the circuit court's judgment after he pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and armed criminal action. Wilson contends that the court erred in denying his Rule 29.07 motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the basis that the court misunderstood his grounds for relief. He also contends that the court erred because the record supports a finding that he involuntarily and unintelligently pleaded guilty. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)


Summaries of

State v. Wilson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 18, 2021
626 S.W.3d 882 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel L. WILSON, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: May 18, 2021

Citations

626 S.W.3d 882 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)