From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 2, 2018
370 N.C. 526 (N.C. 2018)

Opinion

No. 171A17

03-02-2018

STATE of North Carolina v. Daryl WILLIAMS

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Scott A. Conklin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant. Gilda C. Rodriguez, for defendant-appellee.


Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Scott A. Conklin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Gilda C. Rodriguez, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse in part the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, and we remand this case to the Court of Appeals to address defendant’s remaining argument on appeal. The State’s petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.


Summaries of

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 2, 2018
370 N.C. 526 (N.C. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Daryl WILLIAMS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Mar 2, 2018

Citations

370 N.C. 526 (N.C. 2018)
809 S.E.2d 581

Citing Cases

State v. McIver

In Williams , defense counsel first objected to evidence of a prior incident before jury selection, but the…

State v. Hairston

But Defendant did not timely object to the testimony when it was elicited before the jury.In State v.…