State v. Williams

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Chris Nathaniel Williams, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 9, 2019

Appellate Case No. 2017-001668 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2017-001668 Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-339

10-09-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Chris Nathaniel Williams, Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and Chris Nathaniel Williams, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Berkeley County
Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and Chris Nathaniel Williams, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.