From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 2, 2011
54 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4D10-237.

March 2, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carlos Augusto Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-9421 CF10A.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Susan D. Cline, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's mitigation of appellant's sentence. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), the motion to mitigate was filed within sixty days of imposition, but the hearing on the motion was held more than sixty days from imposition of the original sentence. Recently, in Schlabach v. State, 37 So.3d 230 (Fla. 2010), our supreme court construed the time periods of the rule and determined that as long as the defendant files the motion to reduce or modify sentence within the sixty-day time period, the trial court does not lose jurisdiction solely because no hearing was scheduled and no order was entered within the sixty-day time period.

In doing so the court quashed our court's decision in State v. Schlabach, 1 So.3d 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), upon which the state has relied in its brief.

Affirmed.

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Williams

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 2, 2011
54 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Darrin WILLIAMS, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 2, 2011

Citations

54 So. 3d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)