From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Whitfield

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
Apr 3, 2018
544 S.W.3d 305 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105178

04-03-2018

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominique WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

Kevin L. Schriener, 141 N. Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Kevin L. Schriener, 141 N. Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Sp.J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The defendant, Dominique Whitfield, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of voluntary manslaughter, in violation of section 565.023 RSMo. (2000 & Supp. 2014), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo. (2016). The trial court imposed the jury’s recommended sentences of fifteen years of imprisonment for voluntary manslaughter and four years for armed criminal action, and ordered the sentences served concurrently. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Whitfield

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
Apr 3, 2018
544 S.W.3d 305 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Whitfield

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominique WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.

Date published: Apr 3, 2018

Citations

544 S.W.3d 305 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)