From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Whitehead

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 29, 2019
Docket No. A-1-CA-37425 (N.M. Ct. App. Apr. 29, 2019)

Opinion

Docket No. A-1-CA-37425

04-29-2019

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM WHITEHEAD, Defendant-Appellant.

COUNSEL Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Eran S. Sharon, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, Santa Fe, NM, Steven James Forsberg, Assistant Appellate Defender, Albuquerque, NM for Appellant.


This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY, Drew D. Tatum, District Judge

COUNSEL

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, Eran S. Sharon, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM for Appellee

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender, Santa Fe, NM, Steven James Forsberg, Assistant Appellate Defender, Albuquerque, NM for Appellant.

JUDGES

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: M. MONICA ZAMORA, Chief Judge, JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Judge.

{1} William Whitehead (Defendant) appeals from his sentencing as a five-time driving while intoxicated (DWI) offender. On appeal, Defendant argued that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence as a five-time offender, where the evidence that the State presented to establish Defendant's identity for two of the prior convictions was insufficient, because the only evidence that contained specific identifiers linking

Defendant to those priors was an inadmissible printout from an unidentified source. This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to reverse. In response, the State has filed a notice of its intent not to file a memorandum in opposition to our notice of proposed disposition.

{2} Accordingly, we rely on the reasoning contained in our notice of proposed disposition and we reverse the sentence imposed and remand for sentencing consistent with this Court's notice of proposed disposition.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

WE CONCUR:

M. MONICA ZAMORA, Chief Judge

JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Whitehead

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 29, 2019
Docket No. A-1-CA-37425 (N.M. Ct. App. Apr. 29, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Whitehead

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM WHITEHEAD…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Apr 29, 2019

Citations

Docket No. A-1-CA-37425 (N.M. Ct. App. Apr. 29, 2019)