Opinion
No. 2556
Opinion Filed April 4, 1913.
APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal of Appeal — Briefs. Where plaintiff in error fails to file briefs, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Syllabus by Brewer, C.)
Error from Custer County Court; A. H. Latimer, Judge.
Action by the State of Oklahoma, County of Custer, against the Weatherford Milling Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Appeal dismissed.
Fred A. Snodgrass and Thomas Thomas, for the State.
Shartel, Keaton Wells, for defendant in error.
The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court April 27, 1911. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 779, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 P. 205; Miller Lumber Co. v. Swink Merc. Co., ante, 130 P. 574.
By the Court: It is so ordered.