From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wapniarski

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 6, 1998
950 P.2d 415 (Or. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

B345525; CA A95589

Submitted on record and briefs October 9, 1997

Reversed and remanded December 17, 1997, appellant's petition for reconsideration to amend disposition of case to read "reversed" rather than "reversed and remanded" granted by order dated January 6, 1998

Appeal from the District Court, Multnomah County, Michael Marcus, Judge.

Garrett A. Richardson filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


Defendant appeals his conviction of driving while under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.110. He assigns error to the court's failure to sustain his objection to expert testimony from a drug recognition expert as lacking in foundation. He also assigns error to the court's failure to grant his motion for judgment of acquittal.

The state concedes that defendant's objection to the testimony should have been sustained and that without it, the evidence was insufficient to convict. We accept the concession.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. Wapniarski

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 6, 1998
950 P.2d 415 (Or. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Wapniarski

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHARLES STANLEY WAPNIARSKI, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 6, 1998

Citations

950 P.2d 415 (Or. Ct. App. 1998)
950 P.2d 415