From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Vincent

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 25, 1993
623 A.2d 1026 (Conn. 1993)

Opinion

(14736)

Decided March 25, 1993


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 249 (AC 10688), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the search warrant application stated probable cause to believe that a crime had been committed?

"2. Was the Appellate Court correct in not deciding (1) whether the seizure of the revolver, the subject of the prosecution, was `inadvertent' under the `plain view' exception to the warrant requirement, and (2) whether the Connecticut constitution requires `inadvertence' under the `plain view' exception even if the United States constitution does not?"


Michael K. Courtney, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Leah Hawley, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Vincent

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 25, 1993
623 A.2d 1026 (Conn. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Vincent

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARK VINCENT

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 25, 1993

Citations

623 A.2d 1026 (Conn. 1993)
623 A.2d 1026

Citing Cases

State v. Vincent

We granted the defendant's petition for certification. State v. Vincent, 225 Conn. 917, 623 A.2d 1026…