From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Vezina

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Dec 14, 2015
NO. 2015 KW 1545 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2015 KW 1545

12-14-2015

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JERROD R. VEZINA


In Re: Jerrod R. Vezina, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 540873. BEFORE: McDONALD, McCLENDON AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. It is well-settled that a guilty plea by its nature admits factual guilt and relieves the State of the necessity to prove it by a contested trial. See State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584, 586 (La. 1976); State v. Bourgeois, 406 So.2d 550, 552 (La. 1981). Furthermore, if the substantive issue an attorney failed to raise has no merit, then the claim the attorney was ineffective for failing to raise the issue also has no merit. State ex rel. Roper v. Cain, 99-2173 (La. App. 1st Cir. 10/26/99), 763 So.2d 1, 5 (per curiam), writ denied, 2000-0975 (La. 11/17/00), 773 So.2d 733.

MRT

JMM

PMc

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Vezina

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Dec 14, 2015
NO. 2015 KW 1545 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Vezina

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JERROD R. VEZINA

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 14, 2015

Citations

NO. 2015 KW 1545 (La. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2015)