From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Vail

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 31, 1993
848 P.2d 148 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

91CR-0190; CA A73120

Submitted on record and briefs December 16, 1992

Conviction affirmed; condition of probation vacated; remanded for resentencing March 31, 1993

Appeal from Circuit Court, Josephine County.

Gerald C. Neufeld, Judge.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Louis B. Miles, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Warren and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; condition of probation that 60 custody units be utilized at discretion of County Probation Department vacated; remanded for resentencing.


After entering a plea of no contest, defendant was convicted of felony driving while suspended. ORS 811.182. The trial court sentenced him to 24 months probation with the special condition that he serve 120 custody units. The court ordered that 60 of the 120 custody units be served "as directed by * * * County Probation Department." Although the error was not preserved, we review under ORAP 5.45. Defendant argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court lacks authority to make such a delegation to the probation department. We accept that concession. OAR 253-05-012 (3)(b); State v. Shefler, 118 Or. App. 536, 847 P.2d 417 (1993).

Conviction affirmed; condition of probation that 60 custody units be utilized at discretion of County Probation Department vacated; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Vail

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 31, 1993
848 P.2d 148 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Vail

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DANIEL EUGENE VAIL, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 31, 1993

Citations

848 P.2d 148 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
848 P.2d 148